<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 45 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4053</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the demand for interest on the belated service tax payment. The decision was based on the mandatory nature of interest payment under Section 75, emphasizing the civil liability aspect and disregarding intent or error as valid considerations under the provision. The absence of legal provision for adjusting excess tax payment against interest dues further weakened the appellants&#039; case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 08:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43400" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 45 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4053</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the demand for interest on the belated service tax payment. The decision was based on the mandatory nature of interest payment under Section 75, emphasizing the civil liability aspect and disregarding intent or error as valid considerations under the provision. The absence of legal provision for adjusting excess tax payment against interest dues further weakened the appellants&#039; case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4053</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>