<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 1008 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184339</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the assessment due to an invalid reopening under section 148. Other issues regarding the treatment of machinery repairs and other repairs as capital expenditure were not separately addressed as a result of the assessment being quashed. The decision was pronounced on 5/5/11.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2016 11:07:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=433996" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 1008 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184339</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the assessment due to an invalid reopening under section 148. Other issues regarding the treatment of machinery repairs and other repairs as capital expenditure were not separately addressed as a result of the assessment being quashed. The decision was pronounced on 5/5/11.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184339</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>