<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2509 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184332</link>
    <description>Transfer pricing on royalty payments cannot be benchmarked at nil by ignoring a genuine long-standing technical collaboration and the actual technical assistance received. A provision for retirement benefits, supported by actual valuation, was treated as an ascertained liability for book profit computation under section 115JB. Foreign travel expenses of a director, where the visits were found to be for business purposes, did not warrant disallowance. A scientifically computed warranty provision based on past experience was allowable, and depreciation on computer peripherals at 60% was supported by binding precedent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2016 10:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=433985" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2509 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184332</link>
      <description>Transfer pricing on royalty payments cannot be benchmarked at nil by ignoring a genuine long-standing technical collaboration and the actual technical assistance received. A provision for retirement benefits, supported by actual valuation, was treated as an ascertained liability for book profit computation under section 115JB. Foreign travel expenses of a director, where the visits were found to be for business purposes, did not warrant disallowance. A scientifically computed warranty provision based on past experience was allowable, and depreciation on computer peripherals at 60% was supported by binding precedent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184332</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>