<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 210 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329612</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the appeal in a case concerning the disallowance of a deduction under Section 80-IA (4) for a Container Freight Station (CFS). The court ruled in favor of the appellant, citing previous decisions supporting the appellant&#039;s position. Additionally, the court dismissed the revenue&#039;s challenge regarding the classification of the CFS as an inland port for eligibility under Section 80-IA(4) and upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance, noting the pending challenges before the Supreme Court. The court also rejected the appellant&#039;s argument regarding the amendment to Section 80-IA(4) Explanation, citing previous decisions against the revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2016 03:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=433963" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 210 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329612</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the appeal in a case concerning the disallowance of a deduction under Section 80-IA (4) for a Container Freight Station (CFS). The court ruled in favor of the appellant, citing previous decisions supporting the appellant&#039;s position. Additionally, the court dismissed the revenue&#039;s challenge regarding the classification of the CFS as an inland port for eligibility under Section 80-IA(4) and upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance, noting the pending challenges before the Supreme Court. The court also rejected the appellant&#039;s argument regarding the amendment to Section 80-IA(4) Explanation, citing previous decisions against the revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329612</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>