<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 196 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329598</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in a tax appeal case where the Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order under section 263 was challenged. The Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision to not accept long term capital gain as &quot;business income&quot; and to store the issue of deduction under section 54 to the Assessing Officer&#039;s file. The Court emphasized the Assessing Officer&#039;s inquiries and the existence of multiple views on the matter, leading to the dismissal of the Tax Appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2022 12:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=433949" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 196 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329598</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in a tax appeal case where the Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order under section 263 was challenged. The Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision to not accept long term capital gain as &quot;business income&quot; and to store the issue of deduction under section 54 to the Assessing Officer&#039;s file. The Court emphasized the Assessing Officer&#039;s inquiries and the existence of multiple views on the matter, leading to the dismissal of the Tax Appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329598</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>