<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 182 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329584</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the assessee was not entitled to claim the deduction under Section 80IB(10) for certain buildings due to delayed Occupation Certificates. However, for other buildings with timely OCs, the deduction was allowed. The appeal by the Assessing Officer was partly allowed, and the cross-objection by the assessee was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2016 03:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=433935" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 182 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329584</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the assessee was not entitled to claim the deduction under Section 80IB(10) for certain buildings due to delayed Occupation Certificates. However, for other buildings with timely OCs, the deduction was allowed. The appeal by the Assessing Officer was partly allowed, and the cross-objection by the assessee was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329584</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>