https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329562 The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by directing the AO to verify the inclusion of remuneration in partners' individual returns, reconcile professional fees disallowance, and delete disallowances of motor car and telephone expenses due to payment of Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT). The Tribunal emphasized the acceptance of the supplementary partnership deed for remuneration calculation and upheld the active involvement of a partner in business activities, overturning incorrect findings by the AO. en-us Wed, 29 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Jul 2016 15:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329562 The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by directing the AO to verify the inclusion of remuneration in partners' individual returns, reconcile professional fees disallowance, and delete disallowances of motor car and telephone expenses due to payment of Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT). The Tribunal emphasized the acceptance of the supplementary partnership deed for remuneration calculation and upheld the active involvement of a partner in business activities, overturning incorrect findings by the AO. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 29 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329562