https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184328 Only documents actually relied upon by the detaining authority must be supplied to enable an effective representation under Article 22(5); documents merely referred to in narration do not attract the same constitutional requirement, and the detention was not held illegal for non-supply of the requested documents. In preventive detention matters, the State must also consider whether the grounds for detention still survive after the lapse of time and whether a proximate nexus remains between the order and the need for custody. The matter was therefore remitted for a fresh administrative decision on whether the detenu should serve the remaining period of detention. en-us Wed, 12 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Dec 2023 19:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184328 Only documents actually relied upon by the detaining authority must be supplied to enable an effective representation under Article 22(5); documents merely referred to in narration do not attract the same constitutional requirement, and the detention was not held illegal for non-supply of the requested documents. In preventive detention matters, the State must also consider whether the grounds for detention still survive after the lapse of time and whether a proximate nexus remains between the order and the need for custody. The matter was therefore remitted for a fresh administrative decision on whether the detenu should serve the remaining period of detention. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 12 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184328