https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184314 A defendant cannot compel a plaintiff to depose personally merely because the plaintiff is represented through a power of attorney; the conduct of the evidence is for the plaintiff to choose, subject to law, and the court should not direct how a party presents its case. Cross-examination is maintainable only after chief-examination has been recorded, so a request to cross-examine before the plaintiff enters the witness box is misconceived. On these principles, the challenge to the trial court's refusal to grant such directions failed and no interference was warranted. en-us Tue, 08 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Jul 2016 14:28:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184314 A defendant cannot compel a plaintiff to depose personally merely because the plaintiff is represented through a power of attorney; the conduct of the evidence is for the plaintiff to choose, subject to law, and the court should not direct how a party presents its case. Cross-examination is maintainable only after chief-examination has been recorded, so a request to cross-examine before the plaintiff enters the witness box is misconceived. On these principles, the challenge to the trial court's refusal to grant such directions failed and no interference was warranted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 08 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184314