<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 148 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329550</link>
    <description>The government allowed the revision application, restoring the original order&#039;s abatement percentage of 25%, and consequently, the original quantum of redemption fine and penalties. The decision emphasized the importance of consistent valuation methods and appropriate penalty measures in cases of smuggling to uphold the integrity of customs regulations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2016 13:05:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=433850" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 148 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329550</link>
      <description>The government allowed the revision application, restoring the original order&#039;s abatement percentage of 25%, and consequently, the original quantum of redemption fine and penalties. The decision emphasized the importance of consistent valuation methods and appropriate penalty measures in cases of smuggling to uphold the integrity of customs regulations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329550</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>