<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 143 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329545</link>
    <description>Declared transaction value under the customs valuation scheme can be rejected only if the Department establishes a recognised exception and supports that rejection with cogent evidence. On the facts, the importer&#039;s declared value was backed by back-to-back commercial documents, a negotiated bundled price, and assessment of identical goods for the same supplier and customer by another Customs House at Kolkata. The Department failed to show contemporaneous higher-priced imports or any other disqualifying circumstance, and a higher discount by itself was insufficient where quantity discount and package pricing were commercially explained and documented. The declared transaction value was therefore required to be accepted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2017 14:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=433845" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 143 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329545</link>
      <description>Declared transaction value under the customs valuation scheme can be rejected only if the Department establishes a recognised exception and supports that rejection with cogent evidence. On the facts, the importer&#039;s declared value was backed by back-to-back commercial documents, a negotiated bundled price, and assessment of identical goods for the same supplier and customer by another Customs House at Kolkata. The Department failed to show contemporaneous higher-priced imports or any other disqualifying circumstance, and a higher discount by itself was insufficient where quantity discount and package pricing were commercially explained and documented. The declared transaction value was therefore required to be accepted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329545</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>