<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (8) TMI 713 - COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE (APPEALS), BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184310</link>
    <description>The appellant successfully challenged the Order-in-Original on grounds of denial of natural justice and lack of discussion on the issue. The Commissioner agreed that the services provided should be classified under Intellectual Property Service, not subject to tax. Consequently, the Order was set aside, and the appeal allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2016 12:41:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=433838" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (8) TMI 713 - COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE (APPEALS), BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184310</link>
      <description>The appellant successfully challenged the Order-in-Original on grounds of denial of natural justice and lack of discussion on the issue. The Commissioner agreed that the services provided should be classified under Intellectual Property Service, not subject to tax. Consequently, the Order was set aside, and the appeal allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184310</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>