<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (12) TMI 393 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184309</link>
    <description>The civil appeals were dismissed for want of prosecution after the Court noted the office report. No substantive issue on central excise was decided, and the order records only the dismissal of the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2016 12:35:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=433837" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (12) TMI 393 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184309</link>
      <description>The civil appeals were dismissed for want of prosecution after the Court noted the office report. No substantive issue on central excise was decided, and the order records only the dismissal of the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184309</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>