<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 1175 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184298</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals for assessment years 2008-09 and 2009-10. It upheld the liability to deduct tax at source under Section 194C and the applicability of Section 40(a)(ia) for disallowing expenditure. However, the issue of whether Section 40(a)(ia) can be invoked for expenditure actually paid within the previous year was remitted back to the Assessing Officer for further examination and decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2016 11:18:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=433814" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 1175 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184298</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals for assessment years 2008-09 and 2009-10. It upheld the liability to deduct tax at source under Section 194C and the applicability of Section 40(a)(ia) for disallowing expenditure. However, the issue of whether Section 40(a)(ia) can be invoked for expenditure actually paid within the previous year was remitted back to the Assessing Officer for further examination and decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184298</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>