https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184290 A writ petition challenging a Customs and Central Excise Settlement Commission order was held not maintainable in the Delhi High Court because the enforcing authority, the Commissioner of Central Excise, was situated in Haryana. The Court held that the Commission's location in New Delhi did not by itself confer territorial jurisdiction, and prior decisions on similar jurisdictional questions supported this view. The petition was dismissed for lack of territorial jurisdiction, without prejudice to the petitioner's right to approach the appropriate forum with territorial competence. en-us Wed, 29 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 12 Jan 2017 13:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184290 A writ petition challenging a Customs and Central Excise Settlement Commission order was held not maintainable in the Delhi High Court because the enforcing authority, the Commissioner of Central Excise, was situated in Haryana. The Court held that the Commission's location in New Delhi did not by itself confer territorial jurisdiction, and prior decisions on similar jurisdictional questions supported this view. The petition was dismissed for lack of territorial jurisdiction, without prejudice to the petitioner's right to approach the appropriate forum with territorial competence. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 29 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184290