https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184285 The stay petition before CESTAT Ahmedabad was allowed unconditionally because the appellant had already paid the service tax demanded on GTA services and relied on Tribunal precedent supporting abatement eligibility. On that basis, the Tribunal waived the requirement of pre-deposit of penalty during the pendency of the appeal. en-us Wed, 03 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 Jul 2016 17:12:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184285 The stay petition before CESTAT Ahmedabad was allowed unconditionally because the appellant had already paid the service tax demanded on GTA services and relied on Tribunal precedent supporting abatement eligibility. On that basis, the Tribunal waived the requirement of pre-deposit of penalty during the pendency of the appeal. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 03 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184285