<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 117 - COMPANY LAW BOARD CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329519</link>
    <description>The text examines a shareholder dispute on maintainability of oppression and mismanagement claims, validity of board meetings, transmission of shares, and an AGM. It notes that the petition failed the statutory membership threshold and also faced issues of disputed trustee authority and a parallel civil suit over share transmission, affecting the rectification request. It further records that the board meetings, transmission of shares, and AGM were treated as valid under the articles and governing rules, while the allegations of oppression, mismanagement, and requests for inspection or production of records were not substantiated on the material discussed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2016 16:46:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=433759" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 117 - COMPANY LAW BOARD CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329519</link>
      <description>The text examines a shareholder dispute on maintainability of oppression and mismanagement claims, validity of board meetings, transmission of shares, and an AGM. It notes that the petition failed the statutory membership threshold and also faced issues of disputed trustee authority and a parallel civil suit over share transmission, affecting the rectification request. It further records that the board meetings, transmission of shares, and AGM were treated as valid under the articles and governing rules, while the allegations of oppression, mismanagement, and requests for inspection or production of records were not substantiated on the material discussed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329519</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>