<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 1081 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184283</link>
    <description>Payments to non-residents for conference speaking and clinical research testing were held not to be fees for included services under the India-US treaty because the services did not make available technical knowledge, experience, skill, know-how, or processes to the payer. The management expert merely shared business experience and strategy at a conference, and the clinical research organisations applied their own expertise to generate reports without transferring reusable know-how. As the treaty test was not met, no tax withholding obligation arose under section 195, and the related demand under sections 201 and 201(1A) could not stand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2023 17:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=433746" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 1081 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184283</link>
      <description>Payments to non-residents for conference speaking and clinical research testing were held not to be fees for included services under the India-US treaty because the services did not make available technical knowledge, experience, skill, know-how, or processes to the payer. The management expert merely shared business experience and strategy at a conference, and the clinical research organisations applied their own expertise to generate reports without transferring reusable know-how. As the treaty test was not met, no tax withholding obligation arose under section 195, and the related demand under sections 201 and 201(1A) could not stand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184283</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>