<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (12) TMI 95 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4027</link>
    <description>A notification governing switch-over to the compounded levy scheme provided only for lapse of unutilized Modvat credit remaining on 1 August 1997 and did not authorise recovery of credit already taken and utilised on inputs in stock or in finished goods; the demand for reversal was therefore unsustainable. The extended limitation period for differential duty on transportation cost also could not be invoked because the show-cause notice did not specifically plead or prove suppression or misstatement with intent to evade duty; that demand was time-barred. Both demands failed in law, leaving the assessee entitled to complete relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43374" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (12) TMI 95 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4027</link>
      <description>A notification governing switch-over to the compounded levy scheme provided only for lapse of unutilized Modvat credit remaining on 1 August 1997 and did not authorise recovery of credit already taken and utilised on inputs in stock or in finished goods; the demand for reversal was therefore unsustainable. The extended limitation period for differential duty on transportation cost also could not be invoked because the show-cause notice did not specifically plead or prove suppression or misstatement with intent to evade duty; that demand was time-barred. Both demands failed in law, leaving the assessee entitled to complete relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4027</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>