<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 105 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329507</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on both issues regarding the deletion of disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) for payments made to advertising agencies and towards collection of advertisements. The matters were remanded to the AO for reconsideration in light of the second proviso to section 40(a)(ia, applicable retrospectively.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2016 16:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=433739" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 105 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329507</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on both issues regarding the deletion of disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) for payments made to advertising agencies and towards collection of advertisements. The matters were remanded to the AO for reconsideration in light of the second proviso to section 40(a)(ia, applicable retrospectively.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329507</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>