<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 101 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329503</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to apply the relaxation introduced by the Finance Act, 2010 retrospectively for TDS deductions. The Revenue&#039;s appeal for failure to deduct TDS was allowed for re-examination by the Assessing Officer. The ITAT partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal by reducing the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) for lack of verifiable expenses to &amp;amp;8377; 22,635 related to Hotel and lunch expenses only.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2016 12:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=433732" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 101 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329503</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to apply the relaxation introduced by the Finance Act, 2010 retrospectively for TDS deductions. The Revenue&#039;s appeal for failure to deduct TDS was allowed for re-examination by the Assessing Officer. The ITAT partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal by reducing the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) for lack of verifiable expenses to &amp;amp;8377; 22,635 related to Hotel and lunch expenses only.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329503</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>