<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 98 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329500</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to levy a penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, amounting to Rs. 1,73,954. The penalty was imposed due to the addition of Rs. 5,11,785 to the assessee&#039;s income based on an estimation of Gross Profit. The Tribunal found that the assessee failed to provide sufficient evidence to counter the findings of deliberate concealment of income and inaccurate particulars, leading to the confirmation of the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2016 18:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=433727" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 98 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329500</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to levy a penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, amounting to Rs. 1,73,954. The penalty was imposed due to the addition of Rs. 5,11,785 to the assessee&#039;s income based on an estimation of Gross Profit. The Tribunal found that the assessee failed to provide sufficient evidence to counter the findings of deliberate concealment of income and inaccurate particulars, leading to the confirmation of the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329500</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>