https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184275 The court partially allowed the appeals and remanded the case for reassessment regarding the inclusion of excise duty in the cost of production. The assessing authority was directed to ensure no double counting of excise duty and to verify its inclusion in the production cost for certain years. The court upheld tax demands for specific years where excise duty was not disclosed, while cases from earlier years were remanded for fresh assessment. The court rejected the petitioner's challenge regarding the denial of adjournment by the assessing officer, allowing the petitioner to file an appeal within 30 days. en-us Mon, 28 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 Jul 2016 16:06:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184275 The court partially allowed the appeals and remanded the case for reassessment regarding the inclusion of excise duty in the cost of production. The assessing authority was directed to ensure no double counting of excise duty and to verify its inclusion in the production cost for certain years. The court upheld tax demands for specific years where excise duty was not disclosed, while cases from earlier years were remanded for fresh assessment. The court rejected the petitioner's challenge regarding the denial of adjournment by the assessing officer, allowing the petitioner to file an appeal within 30 days. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 28 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184275