https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184279 Writ petitions challenging rejection of restoration petitions and prior dismissal of appeals for default were held not entertainable because they were filed after prolonged delay and the explanation showed only procedural and administrative delay. The Court further stated that where the statute does not provide a basis for the relief sought, the Court cannot create a remedy. As no sufficient ground was shown to excuse the laches in approaching the Court, the petitions were dismissed for delay and laches. en-us Mon, 24 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 Jul 2016 16:06:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184279 Writ petitions challenging rejection of restoration petitions and prior dismissal of appeals for default were held not entertainable because they were filed after prolonged delay and the explanation showed only procedural and administrative delay. The Court further stated that where the statute does not provide a basis for the relief sought, the Court cannot create a remedy. As no sufficient ground was shown to excuse the laches in approaching the Court, the petitions were dismissed for delay and laches. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 24 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184279