https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184268 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD confirmed a duty of &8377;2,26,20,002/- against the appellant for denying input credit related to a tower used in telephone services. The matter was remanded to the Commissioner for re-adjudication to clarify if the duty was claimed on the tower itself or on materials used in its construction due to a factual dispute. The decision aimed to resolve this discrepancy at the lower level, emphasizing the need for clarity on the nature of the duty claimed. The impugned order was set aside for further clarification and resolution at the lower level. en-us Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 Jul 2016 15:24:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184268 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD confirmed a duty of &8377;2,26,20,002/- against the appellant for denying input credit related to a tower used in telephone services. The matter was remanded to the Commissioner for re-adjudication to clarify if the duty was claimed on the tower itself or on materials used in its construction due to a factual dispute. The decision aimed to resolve this discrepancy at the lower level, emphasizing the need for clarity on the nature of the duty claimed. The impugned order was set aside for further clarification and resolution at the lower level. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184268