https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184261 A special eviction regime for public premises is described as constitutionally valid because occupiers of Government company and corporation premises form a distinct class and speedier recovery of public property has a rational nexus with the object pursued. The Bombay Rent Act is stated not to prevail over the Public Premises Act, since the Presidential assent attached to the extension legislation was limited to curing repugnancy with specified tenancy laws and could not displace the later public premises regime. Sections 4 and 5 are also read together to require a reasoned, two-stage inquiry by the Estate Officer into unauthorised occupation and the necessity of eviction. en-us Fri, 01 Feb 1991 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 23 Feb 2019 10:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184261 A special eviction regime for public premises is described as constitutionally valid because occupiers of Government company and corporation premises form a distinct class and speedier recovery of public property has a rational nexus with the object pursued. The Bombay Rent Act is stated not to prevail over the Public Premises Act, since the Presidential assent attached to the extension legislation was limited to curing repugnancy with specified tenancy laws and could not displace the later public premises regime. Sections 4 and 5 are also read together to require a reasoned, two-stage inquiry by the Estate Officer into unauthorised occupation and the necessity of eviction. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 01 Feb 1991 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184261