https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4022 The Court directed the respondents to revalidate the license to the extent of the debit entry made in the Duty Entitlement Pass Book (DEPB) script, emphasizing the need to prevent unjust enrichment. The authority was instructed to assess any potential transfer of liability to a third party by the petitioner before making a decision on revalidation within two months. The petitioner was required to approach the respondent authority for revalidation within two weeks. The case was resolved, addressing the delay in refund payment and outlining the process for revalidating the license based on the DEPB script entry. en-us Wed, 29 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 28 Jun 2008 12:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4022 The Court directed the respondents to revalidate the license to the extent of the debit entry made in the Duty Entitlement Pass Book (DEPB) script, emphasizing the need to prevent unjust enrichment. The authority was instructed to assess any potential transfer of liability to a third party by the petitioner before making a decision on revalidation within two months. The petitioner was required to approach the respondent authority for revalidation within two weeks. The case was resolved, addressing the delay in refund payment and outlining the process for revalidating the license based on the DEPB script entry. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 29 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4022