<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (12) TMI 768 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184249</link>
    <description>A Will must be proved by the propounder through due execution, testamentary capacity, and removal of suspicious circumstances; where attesting witnesses are unavailable, legally sufficient secondary evidence is still required. On the facts, execution was not satisfactorily established and doubts arising from the testator&#039;s condition and signature discrepancies were not dispelled, so the Will was not proved. A registered Gift Deed cannot be relied on under the proviso to Section 68 where execution is specifically denied; here, the Gift Deed also remained unproved and was affected by the same surrounding suspicious circumstances, so it could not be acted upon. The concurrent rejection of both documents was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2016 11:41:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=433684" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (12) TMI 768 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184249</link>
      <description>A Will must be proved by the propounder through due execution, testamentary capacity, and removal of suspicious circumstances; where attesting witnesses are unavailable, legally sufficient secondary evidence is still required. On the facts, execution was not satisfactorily established and doubts arising from the testator&#039;s condition and signature discrepancies were not dispelled, so the Will was not proved. A registered Gift Deed cannot be relied on under the proviso to Section 68 where execution is specifically denied; here, the Gift Deed also remained unproved and was affected by the same surrounding suspicious circumstances, so it could not be acted upon. The concurrent rejection of both documents was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184249</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>