<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (3) TMI 386 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184248</link>
    <description>A brief telephonic message that only summons police assistance and does not disclose the material facts of the offence, identify the offender, or identify the victim is not a first information report under Section 154 CrPC. Where the first detailed statement is recorded by the Investigating Officer after reaching the scene or hospital, that statement constitutes the FIR, and later statements are treated as part of the investigation under Section 162 CrPC. On the facts noted, the informant&#039;s detailed statement naming the appellant, together with corroboration from his presence and the recovery of the knife, supported reliance on that statement as the FIR and upheld the reversal of acquittal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2016 11:37:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=433683" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (3) TMI 386 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184248</link>
      <description>A brief telephonic message that only summons police assistance and does not disclose the material facts of the offence, identify the offender, or identify the victim is not a first information report under Section 154 CrPC. Where the first detailed statement is recorded by the Investigating Officer after reaching the scene or hospital, that statement constitutes the FIR, and later statements are treated as part of the investigation under Section 162 CrPC. On the facts noted, the informant&#039;s detailed statement naming the appellant, together with corroboration from his presence and the recovery of the knife, supported reliance on that statement as the FIR and upheld the reversal of acquittal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184248</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>