https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184244 Fraud in fixation of compensation was not established because the record, including the registration endorsement, supported the rate adopted by the acquisition authority. The beneficiary body, however, was entitled under Section 50 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 to notice and a real opportunity to adduce evidence before compensation was determined. Mere awareness of the proceedings or informal interaction with officials was insufficient. As no effective opportunity had been given, the compensation determination could not stand and the matter was remitted for fresh fixation after notice and hearing, without disturbing the acquisition. en-us Wed, 07 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 Jul 2016 11:14:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184244 Fraud in fixation of compensation was not established because the record, including the registration endorsement, supported the rate adopted by the acquisition authority. The beneficiary body, however, was entitled under Section 50 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 to notice and a real opportunity to adduce evidence before compensation was determined. Mere awareness of the proceedings or informal interaction with officials was insufficient. As no effective opportunity had been given, the compensation determination could not stand and the matter was remitted for fresh fixation after notice and hearing, without disturbing the acquisition. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 07 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184244