https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184245 An acquittal may be interfered with in appeal where the appellate court finds the judgment palpably wrong, manifestly erroneous, demonstrably unsustainable, or clearly unreasonable, and such perversity permits reappraisal of the evidence. In a concerted armed attack, liability for murder and related offences can be established through common intention under Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code or common object under Section 149, without proof of a separate overt act by every participant. Here, coordinated participation, eyewitness testimony, medical and forensic evidence, and recovery of bloodstained weapons supported guilt; the plea of self-defence was inconsistent with the injuries and was rejected, and the eyewitness challenge failed. en-us Tue, 04 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 Jul 2016 11:18:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184245 An acquittal may be interfered with in appeal where the appellate court finds the judgment palpably wrong, manifestly erroneous, demonstrably unsustainable, or clearly unreasonable, and such perversity permits reappraisal of the evidence. In a concerted armed attack, liability for murder and related offences can be established through common intention under Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code or common object under Section 149, without proof of a separate overt act by every participant. Here, coordinated participation, eyewitness testimony, medical and forensic evidence, and recovery of bloodstained weapons supported guilt; the plea of self-defence was inconsistent with the injuries and was rejected, and the eyewitness challenge failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 04 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184245