<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (11) TMI 204 - HIGH COURT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4020</link>
    <description>The court held that the Designated Authority is obligated to conduct a sunset review when requested, emphasizing the need for a proper review process to determine the necessity of continuing anti-dumping duties. The Central Government&#039;s decision not to initiate a sunset review was found to be invalid due to non-compliance with procedural requirements. The court quashed the government&#039;s order and directed a reconsideration of the review request, specifying that imports of ferro-silicon from Russia and China should be cleared provisionally until the review is completed. The writ petition was allowed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43367" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (11) TMI 204 - HIGH COURT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4020</link>
      <description>The court held that the Designated Authority is obligated to conduct a sunset review when requested, emphasizing the need for a proper review process to determine the necessity of continuing anti-dumping duties. The Central Government&#039;s decision not to initiate a sunset review was found to be invalid due to non-compliance with procedural requirements. The court quashed the government&#039;s order and directed a reconsideration of the review request, specifying that imports of ferro-silicon from Russia and China should be cleared provisionally until the review is completed. The writ petition was allowed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4020</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>