https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184237 Where the substance of the allegation is false evidence, fabrication of false evidence, or corrupt use of such evidence in a judicial proceeding, the bar under section 195 CrPC applies and cognizance cannot be taken without a complaint by the court concerned. The Court distinguished that category from forgery and use of a forged document as genuine under sections 465 and 471 IPC, which require making a false document and dishonest or fraudulent use of a forged document. On the facts, the conduct was treated as falling within the false-evidence provisions rather than forgery, so prosecution in the forgery form was not maintainable without the statutory complaint. en-us Wed, 18 Aug 1965 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 Jul 2016 17:08:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184237 Where the substance of the allegation is false evidence, fabrication of false evidence, or corrupt use of such evidence in a judicial proceeding, the bar under section 195 CrPC applies and cognizance cannot be taken without a complaint by the court concerned. The Court distinguished that category from forgery and use of a forged document as genuine under sections 465 and 471 IPC, which require making a false document and dishonest or fraudulent use of a forged document. On the facts, the conduct was treated as falling within the false-evidence provisions rather than forgery, so prosecution in the forgery form was not maintainable without the statutory complaint. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 18 Aug 1965 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184237