https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184233 Non-supply of an inquiry report does not automatically invalidate a disciplinary dismissal; the employee must show actual prejudice affecting the outcome. The Supreme Court noted that the respondent had received the report before the statutory appeal and had challenged the findings on merits in writ proceedings, so the High Court should not have presumed prejudice without examining its real effect. Given the serious misconduct involving banking integrity, the Court rejected reliance on the earlier charge-sheet and severability reasoning, and held that disciplinary orders are not set aside mechanically for procedural non-furnishing absent demonstrated prejudice. en-us Tue, 07 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 Jul 2016 15:56:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184233 Non-supply of an inquiry report does not automatically invalidate a disciplinary dismissal; the employee must show actual prejudice affecting the outcome. The Supreme Court noted that the respondent had received the report before the statutory appeal and had challenged the findings on merits in writ proceedings, so the High Court should not have presumed prejudice without examining its real effect. Given the serious misconduct involving banking integrity, the Court rejected reliance on the earlier charge-sheet and severability reasoning, and held that disciplinary orders are not set aside mechanically for procedural non-furnishing absent demonstrated prejudice. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 07 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184233