https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184228 Restitutionary jurisdiction is inherent in every court and is not confined to Section 144 CPC, so a court may grant restorative relief to undo prejudice caused by its own interim order. Where an interlocutory injunction allowed one party to sell another's goods and retain the proceeds, the court could require security for the value of those goods to restore the status quo ante and prevent injustice. Withdrawal of an earlier appeal against the interim order did not defeat that power, and the High Court's security direction was upheld. en-us Mon, 11 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 Jul 2016 14:58:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184228 Restitutionary jurisdiction is inherent in every court and is not confined to Section 144 CPC, so a court may grant restorative relief to undo prejudice caused by its own interim order. Where an interlocutory injunction allowed one party to sell another's goods and retain the proceeds, the court could require security for the value of those goods to restore the status quo ante and prevent injustice. Withdrawal of an earlier appeal against the interim order did not defeat that power, and the High Court's security direction was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 11 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184228