<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 91 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329493</link>
    <description>Refund adjudication cannot stand where part of the claim is rejected without a show-cause notice or personal hearing, because such unilateral action violates natural justice; the partial rejection was set aside. The refund computation under Rule 5 must be made on the total eligible CENVAT credit, and the formula cannot be applied after first deducting inadmissible credit, as that results in a double reduction; the further reduction was also set aside. The assessee was therefore held entitled to the full refund claimed, with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2016 10:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=433652" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 91 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329493</link>
      <description>Refund adjudication cannot stand where part of the claim is rejected without a show-cause notice or personal hearing, because such unilateral action violates natural justice; the partial rejection was set aside. The refund computation under Rule 5 must be made on the total eligible CENVAT credit, and the formula cannot be applied after first deducting inadmissible credit, as that results in a double reduction; the further reduction was also set aside. The assessee was therefore held entitled to the full refund claimed, with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329493</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>