<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 89 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329491</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Order-in-Original confirming a service tax demand, remanding the case for fresh adjudication to address clarified legal positions post-judicial pronouncements. The appellant&#039;s issues, including non-liability of works contracts to service tax pre-1.6.2007 and service tax liability on RMC supply, were to be reevaluated by the primary adjudicating authority. The Revenue did not oppose the remittance for de novo adjudication, emphasizing the applicability of C.I.C.S. to hospital construction for charitable organizations. The decision ensures a fair assessment based on relevant legal precedents, particularly concerning hospital construction for charitable organizations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2016 14:40:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=433650" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 89 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329491</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Order-in-Original confirming a service tax demand, remanding the case for fresh adjudication to address clarified legal positions post-judicial pronouncements. The appellant&#039;s issues, including non-liability of works contracts to service tax pre-1.6.2007 and service tax liability on RMC supply, were to be reevaluated by the primary adjudicating authority. The Revenue did not oppose the remittance for de novo adjudication, emphasizing the applicability of C.I.C.S. to hospital construction for charitable organizations. The decision ensures a fair assessment based on relevant legal precedents, particularly concerning hospital construction for charitable organizations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329491</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>