<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (5) TMI 948 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184224</link>
    <description>Order 22 CPC governs the effect of a party&#039;s death in appeal, and where the sole or relevant appellant dies without substitution of legal representatives within time, the appeal abates by operation of law. A judgment passed against a deceased person is a nullity, but it does not displace the decree under challenge where the appeal has abated in law. The doctrine of merger applies only when a superior court validly exercises appellate jurisdiction and determines the parties&#039; rights by a competent order. On that basis, the first appellate decree survived for execution, merger did not apply, and the execution proceedings remained maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2016 14:16:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=433646" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (5) TMI 948 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184224</link>
      <description>Order 22 CPC governs the effect of a party&#039;s death in appeal, and where the sole or relevant appellant dies without substitution of legal representatives within time, the appeal abates by operation of law. A judgment passed against a deceased person is a nullity, but it does not displace the decree under challenge where the appeal has abated in law. The doctrine of merger applies only when a superior court validly exercises appellate jurisdiction and determines the parties&#039; rights by a competent order. On that basis, the first appellate decree survived for execution, merger did not apply, and the execution proceedings remained maintainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184224</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>