<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 1092 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184215</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court recorded that the petitioner had died during the pendency of the special leave petition, so the petition had abated. On that basis, the criminal special leave petition was dismissed as abated, with no adjudication on the merits of the underlying dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2016 12:38:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=433620" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 1092 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184215</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court recorded that the petitioner had died during the pendency of the special leave petition, so the petition had abated. On that basis, the criminal special leave petition was dismissed as abated, with no adjudication on the merits of the underlying dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184215</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>