https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329474 The court set aside the rejection of the petitioner's application for compassionate appointment to her son due to lack of detailed reasoning and failure to consider the husband's retirement on medical grounds. The court directed a fresh evaluation emphasizing the necessity for substantive reasoning and consideration of medical reasons for retirement in such cases. The second respondent was instructed to reevaluate the application within eight weeks, highlighting the importance of fair decision-making processes and compliance with relevant schemes for compassionate appointments. en-us Tue, 21 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 Jul 2016 13:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329474 The court set aside the rejection of the petitioner's application for compassionate appointment to her son due to lack of detailed reasoning and failure to consider the husband's retirement on medical grounds. The court directed a fresh evaluation emphasizing the necessity for substantive reasoning and consideration of medical reasons for retirement in such cases. The second respondent was instructed to reevaluate the application within eight weeks, highlighting the importance of fair decision-making processes and compliance with relevant schemes for compassionate appointments. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 21 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329474