<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 58 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329460</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the income from the sale of equity shares should be classified as short-term capital gain instead of business income. The decision was based on the assessee&#039;s consistent treatment of the transactions as investments, the use of own funds, and the guidance from the latest CBDT Circulars. The Tribunal overturned the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, allowing the appeal in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2016 23:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=433586" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 58 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329460</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the income from the sale of equity shares should be classified as short-term capital gain instead of business income. The decision was based on the assessee&#039;s consistent treatment of the transactions as investments, the use of own funds, and the guidance from the latest CBDT Circulars. The Tribunal overturned the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, allowing the appeal in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329460</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>