<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 57 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329459</link>
    <description>The appeal of the assessee was partly allowed by the Tribunal. The disallowance of 20% of the expenditure was deleted, the decision on the cost of the shed was upheld, and partial relief was granted on the addition of agricultural income. The levy of interest under sections 234A, 234B, and 234C was considered consequential and not adjudicated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2016 12:08:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=433585" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 57 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329459</link>
      <description>The appeal of the assessee was partly allowed by the Tribunal. The disallowance of 20% of the expenditure was deleted, the decision on the cost of the shed was upheld, and partial relief was granted on the addition of agricultural income. The levy of interest under sections 234A, 234B, and 234C was considered consequential and not adjudicated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329459</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>