<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 53 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329455</link>
    <description>The Tribunal accepted the revised computation of income by the assessee without a revised return, classifying profits from share transactions as business income. The High Court upheld this decision, finding no substantial question of law. The Court also allowed the interest paid on borrowed funds for business purposes as an allowable expenditure, in line with the treatment of share transaction gains as business income. The appeal was dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2016 18:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=433581" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 53 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329455</link>
      <description>The Tribunal accepted the revised computation of income by the assessee without a revised return, classifying profits from share transactions as business income. The High Court upheld this decision, finding no substantial question of law. The Court also allowed the interest paid on borrowed funds for business purposes as an allowable expenditure, in line with the treatment of share transaction gains as business income. The appeal was dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329455</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>