<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 1061 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184209</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions in dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal on three issues: disallowance of expenses based on precedent, disallowance of interest on interest-free loans to related parties, and disallowance of conversion expenses as capital expenditure. The ITAT found that the Revenue failed to provide evidence to challenge the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions and upheld the reasoning that the expenses were necessary for the business and not capital expenditures.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2016 11:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=433577" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 1061 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184209</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions in dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal on three issues: disallowance of expenses based on precedent, disallowance of interest on interest-free loans to related parties, and disallowance of conversion expenses as capital expenditure. The ITAT found that the Revenue failed to provide evidence to challenge the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions and upheld the reasoning that the expenses were necessary for the business and not capital expenditures.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184209</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>