<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 922 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184213</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court remanded the matter to the Tribunal because the issue on the applicability of the clarification issued under one exemption notification to another had been raised earlier but no finding had been recorded. As the Department also sought remand for a fresh decision on all points, the Court sent the appeals back for determination of that issue, leaving all contentions open. The operative result was a remand for fresh findings on the scope and effect of the departmental clarification in relation to the exemption notification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2016 11:08:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=433573" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 922 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184213</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court remanded the matter to the Tribunal because the issue on the applicability of the clarification issued under one exemption notification to another had been raised earlier but no finding had been recorded. As the Department also sought remand for a fresh decision on all points, the Court sent the appeals back for determination of that issue, leaving all contentions open. The operative result was a remand for fresh findings on the scope and effect of the departmental clarification in relation to the exemption notification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184213</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>