https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184206 Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure was construed as a self-contained special provision for suits concerning public charitable or religious trusts. The phrase "or any other court empowered by the State Government" was read as creating an alternative forum, not replacing the District Court, so a notified subordinate court and the District Court both retained concurrent jurisdiction. General territorial rules under sections 15 to 20 of the Code and pecuniary limits under the Tamil Nadu Civil Courts Act were held inapplicable to this special jurisdiction. The challenge to the District Court's jurisdiction therefore failed, and the suit was directed to proceed there. en-us Fri, 22 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 24 Aug 2023 15:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184206 Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure was construed as a self-contained special provision for suits concerning public charitable or religious trusts. The phrase "or any other court empowered by the State Government" was read as creating an alternative forum, not replacing the District Court, so a notified subordinate court and the District Court both retained concurrent jurisdiction. General territorial rules under sections 15 to 20 of the Code and pecuniary limits under the Tamil Nadu Civil Courts Act were held inapplicable to this special jurisdiction. The challenge to the District Court's jurisdiction therefore failed, and the suit was directed to proceed there. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 22 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184206