<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (8) TMI 423 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184205</link>
    <description>A jail trial was upheld where the High Court validly notified Tihar Jail as the Sessions venue under Section 9(6) of the Code, and reasonable regulation of access did not violate the right to an open trial under Section 327. Statements before the Thakkar Commission were protected by Section 6 of the Commissions of Inquiry Act and could not be used for contradiction or other forensic purposes in the criminal trial; the Commission report had no evidentiary value. On the merits, Balbir Singh&#039;s involvement in conspiracy was not proved and his conviction was set aside, while the evidence established Kehar Singh&#039;s participation in the conspiracy and Satwant Singh&#039;s role in the , and the death sentence was affirmed as falling within the rarest of rare category.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2016 10:22:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=433567" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (8) TMI 423 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184205</link>
      <description>A jail trial was upheld where the High Court validly notified Tihar Jail as the Sessions venue under Section 9(6) of the Code, and reasonable regulation of access did not violate the right to an open trial under Section 327. Statements before the Thakkar Commission were protected by Section 6 of the Commissions of Inquiry Act and could not be used for contradiction or other forensic purposes in the criminal trial; the Commission report had no evidentiary value. On the merits, Balbir Singh&#039;s involvement in conspiracy was not proved and his conviction was set aside, while the evidence established Kehar Singh&#039;s participation in the conspiracy and Satwant Singh&#039;s role in the , and the death sentence was affirmed as falling within the rarest of rare category.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184205</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>