https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184203 The State was recognised as a juristic person and an aggrieved party entitled to invoke the High Court's inherent jurisdiction under section 561-A for expunction of adverse remarks. The High Court's inherent power to expunge judicial remarks was affirmed, but only in exceptional cases where intervention is needed to prevent abuse of process or secure the ends of justice. Applying that standard, sweeping and unsupported remarks against the police force, unnecessary to the decision and based on no evidence, were held to warrant expunction. The impugned remarks were therefore directed to be removed. en-us Fri, 15 Mar 1963 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 Jul 2016 18:56:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184203 The State was recognised as a juristic person and an aggrieved party entitled to invoke the High Court's inherent jurisdiction under section 561-A for expunction of adverse remarks. The High Court's inherent power to expunge judicial remarks was affirmed, but only in exceptional cases where intervention is needed to prevent abuse of process or secure the ends of justice. Applying that standard, sweeping and unsupported remarks against the police force, unnecessary to the decision and based on no evidence, were held to warrant expunction. The impugned remarks were therefore directed to be removed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 15 Mar 1963 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184203