<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (10) TMI 208 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4008</link>
    <description>The appeal challenging the confirmation of Service Tax under the Mandap Keepers category was dismissed. Despite claiming to be a Government Department, the appellants failed to establish their non-commercial auditorium&#039;s exemption from the tax. Their non-appearance during hearings and delays weakened their case. The judgment referenced a prior ruling supporting the tax levy on similar activities, justifying the imposition in this instance. The distinction between &#039;cultural event&#039; and &#039;social function&#039; was debated, with cultural events deemed part of social functions for tax purposes. The exclusion of certain activities from the tax levy was acknowledged, and the appeal was dismissed based on findings consistent with previous judgments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43355" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (10) TMI 208 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4008</link>
      <description>The appeal challenging the confirmation of Service Tax under the Mandap Keepers category was dismissed. Despite claiming to be a Government Department, the appellants failed to establish their non-commercial auditorium&#039;s exemption from the tax. Their non-appearance during hearings and delays weakened their case. The judgment referenced a prior ruling supporting the tax levy on similar activities, justifying the imposition in this instance. The distinction between &#039;cultural event&#039; and &#039;social function&#039; was debated, with cultural events deemed part of social functions for tax purposes. The exclusion of certain activities from the tax levy was acknowledged, and the appeal was dismissed based on findings consistent with previous judgments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4008</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>