<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 48 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329450</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal partially allowed the appeal by disallowing the refund related to sampling, weighing, and stuffing supervision, as well as travelling charges, under technical testing and analysis services. The tribunal referred to previous judgments to support its decision on handling charges, transportation of empty containers, and other charges.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2016 13:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=433520" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 48 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329450</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal partially allowed the appeal by disallowing the refund related to sampling, weighing, and stuffing supervision, as well as travelling charges, under technical testing and analysis services. The tribunal referred to previous judgments to support its decision on handling charges, transportation of empty containers, and other charges.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329450</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>